Have you caught the Wordle bug yet? Each morning The New York Times posts a new Wordle puzzle up on the internet and you have one day to solve it. The answer is a five-letter word and you get six tries. Each guess must be a valid five-letter word. After you type in your guess and hit the enter button, the color of the tiles will change to reflect how close your guess came. Wrong guesses get blacked out on the keyboard. If a letter in your word is correct but not in the correct position, it will show as yellow; if it’s correct AND in the right position, it will show as green. If you haven’t played it yet, give it a try. It’s amazingly addictive and besides, everyone is doing it! You want to hang out with the cool guys, don’t you?
But these last few weeks, as I’ve settled in with my first mug of coffee and played, I’ve realized how this simple little word game has a lot in common with writing (the activity I’m supposed to be doing when I drink my SECOND mug of coffee). To wit:
There are lots of different ways to get there.
Wordle accommodates all types of personalities. Maybe you like to play it safe. You pick the same first word every time. You pick first words with lots of vowels (adieu seems to be a favorite.) You don’t guess until you’re pretty sure you’re right. In other words, you take the analytical approach. Or conversely, you throw stuff against the wall. You change up your first guess every time (my approach). You pick obscure words. You sacrifice an early try to find more consonants. That’s the free form approach. And interestingly, both ways are perfectly valid and can yield successful results.
In writing, we call this being a “plotter” or a “pantser.” A plotter works from an outline, be it bullet points in a Word document, index cards lined up on a corkboard, or any of the myriad story structure approaches you see floating around, from Scrivener to Save the Cat to Story Grid. A pantser, on the other hand, sits down in the chair and lets her muse take over. She goes down blind alleys, led by the sense that something interesting might happen and why don’t we see what it is. This type of writer is always surprised at what happens in the novel. The plotter hates surprises.
You’ll find fans of both approaches in any writing roundtable and each is convinced their way works best. And they’re both right.
Sometimes you need to change your mindset.
Thinking outside the box can lead to success in both Wordle and writing. For example, most newbie Wordle players think there are rules that can’t be broken. They stick within strict parameters and then cry foul when letters are repeated or a word starts with a vowel or the word borders on being “foreign” (two weeks ago the word “rupee” ruined a lot of more conservative player’s long-running streaks).
And isn’t that just like writing? Sometimes you have to mix it up. You might change the point-of-view character. You might set the action in a small town or conversely, in the 17th century. You might decide to make a male character a female or a female character a robot. You could write the story in the present tense instead of the past. Change the narrative to an epistolary novel or one that takes place primarily through podcast transcripts. Regardless, the idea is to experiment with the process and not get locked in to one way of approaching the task.
The further you go, the clearer the path. But there’s always room for a twist.
In Wordle, once you’ve figured out two letters or so, particularly if you know their correct positions, the task gets easier. There is no time limit so you can experiment by putting different combinations of letters together and then when you see it won’t work, you backtrack. But you’ve already figured out a couple of the parameters that are correct, so some permutations are closed off to you. You know the first letter is “s” and the last three “are” so you confidently guess “stare.” But you’re wrong. Confident now, you type in “spare.” And you’re wrong. Hopefully you still have one more chance to get it right. But is it “snare” or “scare”? How many guesses do you still have left?
Likewise, when your novel is at the half-way point, you’ve nailed down certain aspects of the plot (who got murdered, who loves who, who is keeping a secret and what it is) and as a result, it becomes easier to write forward. In a weird way, having fewer choices makes it easier – if someone’s dead and your protagonist is a police detective, then somewhere you’ve got to have a murderer (or two). Options narrow and the reader can become over-confident, thinking the answer is obvious. But just as in Wordle, the mastermind behind the game may throw in a twist or two.
Have you tried Wordle yet? What other word games do you like to play and have any of them taught you something you found useful in your writing?
P.S. Just finished the game for this morning (Tuesday) – Got it in three tries!
Fun, fun, fun article. Yes, I have the bug. And have you tried Quordle? I don’t know what is says about me as a writer that I keep changing my opening words.
I tried Quordle for the first time yesterday. MUCH harder. I always pick a different opening word – I never plan it ahead of time. I just wake up and one pops into my head and I go with it.
I have caught the bug and love it in my waking life but twice I have dreamt I am solving a Wordl. Not so happy about the dream but since I do like analyzing dreams I think maybe my brain is working through my writing methods. Thanks for spurring food for thought. 🙂
A fellow wordsmith! Thanks for commenting.
I’ve caught the VIRAL Wordle bug. Big time! So much so that I went ahead and created a blog out of it. Specifically dedicated to the Wordle and the fellow Wordlers but that’s for some other time.
Anyways, I like to play safe and be analytical, using the words from the best starting wordle words but sometimes, I just throw stuff around and see what sticks on the wall. I’m not sure what personality trait I’d fall into. Probably, this is what we call MOODY. That’s a great Wordle word as well. 😀
Anyways, nice blog. I appreciate your efforts, Maggie.
Keep it up.