Last year, I judged the Edgar Awards for the Mystery Writers of America. I was on the committee that selected Best Novel.
My committee was nine judges to start with, including me. One judge dropped out somewhere around August, perhaps overwhelmed by the number of books or underwhelmed by the stories he was reading. I’ll never know.
In all, our committee evaluated 535 books.
That is not a typo.
Five hundred.
And 35.
The UPS guy was at my door three or four times a week. FedEx, same thing. Books came in the mail, too. They piled up all over the house, but their primary residence was on the landing and stairs to my basement office.
You can watch a clip of me announcing the winner last week in New York City. It was quite the honor to be involved in this process and even more of an honor to chair the group.
How did we manage to judge 535 books? I won’t go into the details. Every judging process is different and every judging process has its own rules.
With eight judges participating in the group email chatter about why we liked one book or didn’t like another, one thing became very clear—that the five finalists and one winner would have broad appeal. There were a couple of titles that, to me, belonged in the final five. One title in particular blew me away. But one judge is only one judge. Other judges had their favorites as well.
So what did the five have in common? What made them standouts?
If I had to boil that answer down to two attributes, it would be these:
1. Strong idea.
2. Smooth, bold, confident execution that didn’t draw attention to itself. (Story over flashy prose, in other words.)
In all five finalists, I think the one thing that ties them together is that the story and the character are matched perfectly with the tone and unwavering voice of the storyteller.
True fact: some offbeat, quirky stories were not in the final mix of five. That doesn’t mean those books were in any way unworthy. In fact, there are many titles that have already sold FAR MORE copies and will sell FAR MORE copies in the future than the final five from our process. And there are a few titles that grappled with unusual subjects in unusual ways or in unusual settings that truly impacted a few judges and are now among our favorite books of all time—but that didn’t make the final five. Group process means group results.
One thing is clear—there were a ton of great mysteries published in 2017. Of the 535, I could have easily promoted 50 or 60 titles as interesting reads to various friends. And there were a bunch of books that seemed to be playing it a bit too safe, that had that paint-by-numbers flavor to them. (These 535 are only a fraction of all mysteries published last year, given independent presses, small presses, and self-published works, too.)
I guess the question is, can you plan ahead to write an award-winning book? It would be nice if that was the case—here’s the formula, go to it. But it’s no formula. It’s the special alchemy of writing, when a writer’s vision and story connect in some mysterious way that takes the readers to unexpected places and shows them the world in a new way or through fresh eyes.
Advice culled from all this? Choose your best idea. Stick with it. Write it with conviction. It never hurts to let the reader know, early on, that you know your story and you’re the right writer to tell it. A sure hand will give the reader confidence to sit back and go with the flow. At that point, you’ve got readers right where you want them: in your hands.
++
The five finalists were:
The Dime by Kathleen Kent (Hachette Book Group – Little, Brown & Co./Mulholland Books)
Prussian Blue by Philip Kerr (Penguin Random House – Marian Wood Books/G.P. Putnam’s Sons)
Bluebird, Bluebird* by Attica Locke (Hachette Book Group – Little, Brown & Co./Mulholland Books)
A Rising Man by Abir Mukherjee (Pegasus Books)
The Twelve Lives of Samuel Hawley by Hannah Tinti (Penguin Random House – The Dial Press)
*Winner
Mark, your insider glimpse of the judging process is amazing. Mind-blowing. Insightful. The image of the UPS man alone will stay with me, and I’ll never think of a major contest in the same way. Thank you for sharing your experience with us.
Thank you as always, Janet !
Thanks, Mark. Here’s a question: Did devoting so much time and energy to this process help you to become a better writer? I
I would say “yes,” Shannon. I think in terms of idea selection and aiming for sure a sure, solid writer voice. Does that make sense?
Mark, I was head of the Paperback Original/E-book category last year, and you got it spot on. Our process was the same, and we came up with a very diverse group of books. In the end, we agreed that our selections pleased us. But….536 books? We only had somewhere around 350 and it seemed impossible. Like you, I mourn a few books that didn’t have enough wide appeal, but the finalists were wonderful.
Thanks, Terry ! Our committee was also very pleased with all our five finalists….so that’s saying something…!
The finalists are now on my TBR list…along with all the CBA and CAL finalists. My “want to read” list is getting really, really long. This judging gig sounds like a big job, Mark. I think I’ll refrain from volunteering for this one.. 😀
🙂
Fascinating insider look, with great advice to boot. Thank you, Mark!
Thank you Scott !
I’ve judged a number of times for the Edgars and for the Thriller Awards, and it’s always a daunting task. Your comments about the FedEx and UPS delivery-persons in your comments at Edgars was spot on. I think my neighbors thought I was having an affair with the man in the short brown pants. And I had the same epiphany–there were books that were great that didn’t make the cut; there were books that would be more commercial that didn’t make the cut. But one thing stood out–all the books that did become finalists were exceptional. And–with your 50 and 60 that you’d recommend–spot on again. The cream rises to the top. It’s a hard decision, and I think you for taking it on!
Thank you, Chris! I am very glad I did this and very glad it’s over. Would I do it again? Maybe in a category with fewer entries ….?
Mark, great insider post about judging contests; however, the number of books you dealt with overwhelms my imagination. The distillation of the winning books for their common attributes is good information and sounds right, but I believe you nailed it with your disclaimer about the special alchemy of writing. To win, a writer must focus not some prize but on how best to help the reader enjoy the story. Thanks for your knowledge.